Abstract

The current research examined the identified impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and relationships that are cross-cultural? (2) just how do the individuals feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they will react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that most the individuals were affected by the pressure that is social upon them. More over, the participants sensed the previous generation as “racist”. Nevertheless, interestingly you will find signs of an attitude shift that is generational. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 per cent for the participants would not would you like to interfere within their children’s partner selection. The residual 20 percent had been against interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages.

It is a preview of membership content, access via your organization.

Access choices

Purchase article that is single

Immediate access to your full article PDF.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Contribute to journal

Immediate on the web access to all or any problems from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.

Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.

Records

It ought to be noted that relationship is generally speaking perhaps perhaps perhaps not appropriate into the Arab and community that is muslim others) unless the couple’s intention would be to date solely (nevertheless, particular limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., restricting intimate tasks) along with the try to get hitched. Furthermore, in some instances, the approval associated with the female’s daddy ( or other significant male figure) is had a need to allow this relationship to transpire. This matter had been addressed during the assortment of the information to be able to respect individuals’ social traditions and spiritual observing.

Recommendations

Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial discussion: Uncertainty, understanding, and also the growth of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social therapy (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test associated with the contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.

Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin males dating Jewish ladies. nana10. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227.

Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing information that is qualitative Thematic analysis and rule development. New York, NY: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and marriage among Muslim adults: The role of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous kinds of tradition. US Psychologist, 64, 194–204.

Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex and also the context that is cultural of and intimacy. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.

Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.

Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, culture, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Indication, 26, 415–440.

Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.

Felmlee, D. (2003). Relationship in social support systems. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Ny: Plenum.

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking attributes because of the passing of some time relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.

Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of battle for starting a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.

Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the choice of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Reasons, patterns, trends. Yearly Report About Sociology, 395–421.

Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains for a Code of Honor: The marginalization that is murderous of in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.

Lewis, R. (1973). Social effect together with development of dyads: an approach that is interactionist mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.

Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to create and implementation. London: Wiley.

Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a little university campus. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence systems while the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Research, 10, 55–79.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies as well as the growth of romantic relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.

Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social networking sites on romantic relationships: Through the lens of this network that is social. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.

Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and types of qualitative interview studies. Ny: The Complimentary Press.

Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training fulfills conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort advertising training. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Factors affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural https://www.besthookupwebsites.org/hot-or-not-review and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not all the love affairs are designed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in an area that is conflict-ridden. Center East Journal.